Cases 41 - 50 of 71
THURMAN v. LAWRENCE, et al.
as 1:2015cv01085
Defendant:
SARAH BARKER and WILLIAM LAWRENCE
Plaintiff:
SHARON THURMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez et al v County of Porter Indiana et al
as 2:2015cv00035
Plaintiff:
Carlos Martinez and Renee Martinez
Defendant:
County of Porter Indiana , Porter County Drug Task Force , Porter County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill et al v. St. Joseph County et al
as 3:2014cv01962
Plaintiff:
Tabitha Hill and Anthony Hill
Defendant:
St Joseph County , Humane Society St Joseph County of , Carol Ecker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Fender et al v. Sailors et al
as 4:2014cv00024
Plaintiff:
Wayne Alan Fender and Donna Marie Pulous
Defendant:
Sarah Sailors, Sally Hernandez, Ashley Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Middleton v. Quaglio et al
as 4:2014cv00022
Plaintiff:
Robert Middleton
Defendant:
Sarah J Quaglio, Crystal Sanders, Victoria M Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
SRIVASTAVA v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2013cv00200
Defendant:
SARAH EVANS BARKER, GERALD BEPKO, BOSE MCKINNEY & EVANS LLP and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN H. SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
