Cases 41 - 50 of 51
SMITH v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY COMMON PLESE COURT et al
as 2:2016cv01132
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY COMMON PLESE COURT, PENNSYLVANIA BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS, MERCY BEHAIVOR HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
DRAYTON v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2015cv02114
Plaintiff:
DEWITT DRAYTON
Defendant:
LOUIS GIORLA, MATTHEWS, SERRANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grayson v. DeWitt et al
as 1:2015cv00453
Plaintiff:
Louis G. Grayson
Defendant:
Matthew DeWitt , Paul Thorne , Christopher Roosen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kline v. Hall et al
as 1:2012cv01727
Plaintiff:
Garry Ray Kline
Defendant:
Kenneth Hall , Terry DeWitt and Preston Strayer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv07647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DeWitt v. Delaware Valley School District et al
as 3:2010cv01836
Plaintiff:
Kevin DeWitt
Defendant:
Delaware Valley School District , Joseph Casmus , Christopher Pietraszewski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor v. JFC Staffing Associates et al
as 1:2008cv01610
Plaintiff:
Dewitt Taylor
Defendant:
JFC Staffing Associates, Jamie Scott, Karen Roth and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Smith v. Jefferson Regional Medical Center
as 3:2008cv00037
Plaintiff:
Dewitt Thomas Smith
Defendant:
Jefferson Regional Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
