Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Amrhein v. La Madeleine Inc et al
as 4:2011cv00364
Plaintiff:
Darlene C Amrhein
Defendant:
La Madeleine Inc , State of Texas , Rick Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00811
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Pierce v. The City of Arlington et al
as 4:2011cv00193
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Pierce
Defendant:
The City of Arlington , James Hawthorne , D Vo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv04432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Flores v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incoporated
as 5:2009cv00788
Plaintiff:
Juan Alvaro Flores
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incoporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ferguson v. Baughman, et al
as 4:2009cv00468
Plaintiff:
Gene Ferguson and Gene Ferguson
Defendant:
samuel baughman, ronald chapmon, wendell pierce and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Tyler et al v. Dallas County et al
as 3:2009cv01460
Plaintiff:
Ron Tyler, Sherry Tyler, Melania Tyler and others
Defendant:
Dallas County, Dallas County, Craig Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Richardson et al v. Erwin et al
as 3:2007cv02117
Plaintiff:
Kenneth H Richardson and Jennie S Richardson
Defendant:
James E Erwin and Mike Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pierce v. Scarlatt Holdings Ltd et al
as 6:2007cv00405
Plaintiff:
Willie Pierce
Defendant:
Scarlatt Holdings Ltd and Park Place Apartments
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
