Cases 41 - 50 of 338
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Chappel v. Sea Breeze Health Care et al
as 2:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Mai Chappel
Defendant:
Sea Breeze Health Care, David K. Tran, David Ozeran and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Fleming v. Rivard et al
as 3:2022cv00210
Plaintiff:
Major Fleming
Defendant:
Shawn T. Rivard, Vince J. Macano and Virginia State Police Aviation Units
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Novak v. Stuart
as 1:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Novak
Defendant:
Trooper Allen T. Stuart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yoo v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2022cv00182
Plaintiff:
James W. Yoo
Defendant:
The State of New York, Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Monroe, Richard A. Dollinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clervrain et al v. Anderson et al
as 3:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain and Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu
Defendant:
Richard L. Anderson, Morton Blackwell, Patricia Bast Lyman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garnes v. Slurry Pavers, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00806
Plaintiff:
Darrius T. Garnes
Defendant:
Slurry Pavers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lynch v. AT&T Wireless
as 3:2021cv00801
Plaintiff:
John D. Lynch, II
Defendant:
AT&T Wireless
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
McSheffrey v. Wilder et al
as 2:2021cv00630
Plaintiff:
John P. McSheffrey
Defendant:
Lily I. Wilder and Ryan T. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
