Cases 41 - 50 of 225
Howard v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv00543
Defendant:
Unknown Green, John Does 1-5, South Mississippi Correctional Institution and others
Plaintiff:
Tony M. Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Big Time Vapes, Inc. et al v. Food and Drug Administration et al
as 1:2019cv00531
Defendant:
Norman E. Sharpless, Ned, Alex M. Azar, II and others
Plaintiff:
Big Time Vapes, Inc. and United States Vaping Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00152
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Wooten v. Smith et al
as 1:2019cv00340
Defendant:
Dustin Uselton, Faith E. Peterson, Herman Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Alan Wooten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
St. Julien-Mims et al v. Hancock County Chamber of Commerce
as 1:2019cv00339
Defendant:
Hancock County Chamber of Commerce
Plaintiff:
Constance E. St. Julien-Mims and Unique Transitions Training Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00122
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Towns v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2019cv00070
Defendant:
Superintendent Marshal Turner, K-9 Officer "John" Scott, K-9 Officer "John" Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Towns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Rogers v. Mississippi Dep't of Corrections et al
as 4:2018cv00257
Plaintiff:
John D. Rogers
Defendant:
Mississippi Dep't of Corrections, Sean Smith and Pelicia E. Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00202
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.