Cases 41 - 50 of 273
JONES v. ANDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2022cv00507
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
ANDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOSHA BOWLING, MATTHEW KOPP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JONES v. GENERAL MOTORS LLC
as 1:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
JACKQUELLA JONES
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WILLIAMS v. DWD-UI CONTACT CENTER IU TEAM et al
as 1:2022cv00214
Plaintiff:
QURTIS MANDALE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DWD-UI CONTACT CENTER IU TEAM, DWD, VALDIVIA DEMERITT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
Jones v. Landraf et al
as 3:2021cv00963
Plaintiff:
Richard Jones and Richard A Jones
Defendant:
Robert Landgraf, Jr and City Council Members
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. KOKOMO POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2021cv02989
Plaintiff:
SCOTT ELLIOTT JONES
Defendant:
KOKOMO POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones, Jr. v. Valparaiso Community School Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv00370
Plaintiff:
James R. Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Valparaiso Community School Corporation, Principal Loren Hershberger, Chief Jeffrey Balon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Reillo et al
as 2:2021cv00142
Defendant:
P.O. Alexander Reillo, City of Munster, Alexander Reillo and others
Plaintiff:
Damonte Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
