Cases 41 - 50 of 68
INIRO v. CBA INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv06332
Plaintiff:
JOSEFA GUILLERMO INIRO
Defendant:
CBA INDUSTRIES, INC. , CBA INSERT DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC. and ABC CORPS.1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv07674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Garrett Miller v. Pfizer Inc, et al
as 11-3305
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARRETT M. MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
PFIZER INC, ABC CORPS 1-3, said names being fictitious and unknown and XYZ CORPS 1-3, said names being fictitious and unknown
PRATT v. THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NY & NJ et al
as 2:2011cv04880
Plaintiff:
CHARLES PRATT
Defendant:
THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NY & NJ, THE PORT AUTHORITY POLICE DEPT., ABC CORP. 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RATLIFF v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE et al
as 3:2011cv04084
Plaintiff:
SHAYONE RATLIFF
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, ABC CORP. 1-3 and JOHN DOE 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLIOTT v. COUNTY OF UNION et al
as 2:2011cv03085
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ELLIOTT
Defendant:
COUNTY OF UNION, UNION COUNTY JAIL, ABC CORP. 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIAZ v. TOWNSHIP OF UNION CITY et al
as 2:2011cv02364
Plaintiff:
DIEGO DIAZ
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF UNION CITY, TOWNSHIP OF UNION CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, P.O. CORBO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANCHEZ v. CITY OF PLAINFIELD et al
as 2:2011cv01314
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO SANCHEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF PLAINFIELD, CITY OF PLAINFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, HELWIG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
