Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv03702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rittenhouse Entertainment, Inc. et al v. City of Wilkes-Barre et al
as 3:2011cv00617
Plaintiff:
Rittenhouse Entertainment, Inc. , The Mines, Inc. , G Net Comm. Co. and others
Defendant:
City of Wilkes-Barre, Thomas Leighton, Gerald Dessoye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
GLUNK v. MAINLINE HOSPITALS, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv00405
Plaintiff:
RICHARD P. GLUNK, MD
Defendant:
MAINLINE HOSPITALS, INC. , MAIN LINE HEALTH, INC. , JOHN J. LYNCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boldrini v. Ponce et al
as 3:2010cv02065
Plaintiff:
Antonello Boldrini
Defendant:
Carol Ponce, F Cortez Bell, Patrick Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERRY v. BARRETT et al
as 2:2010cv01221
Plaintiff:
SALEEM BERRY
Defendant:
RICHARD IAN BARRETT, CONOR MULLEN and JOHN ORLANDO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joline v. Barrett et al
as 4:2010cv01328
Plaintiff:
Kathy Joline
Defendant:
Eugene Barrett, Borough of Benton and Borough of Benton Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose et al v. Barret Township et al
as 3:2009cv01561
Plaintiff:
Doloros M Rose and Dolores M Rose
Defendant:
Barret Township, Barrett Township Police Department, Larry Raisner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Schimes v. Barrett et al
as 3:2007cv00872
Plaintiff:
Joseph Schimes
Defendant:
Thomas Barrett, CHRIS DOHERTY, GARY DIBELIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
