Cases 41 - 50 of 92
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHECKER CAB PHILADELPHIA, INC. et al v. THE PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2016cv04669
Plaintiff:
CHECKER CAB PHILADELPHIA, INC. , CRESCENT CAB , FREEDOM TAXI and others
Defendant:
THE PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY and VINCENT J. FENERTY, JR.
Movant:
BUCKS COUNTY, SERVICES INC. , GERMANTOWN CAB COMPANY , THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Respondent:
MAVERICK STRATEGIES , LYFT, INC. and RED MAVERICK MEDIA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Fox v. Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2016cv01511
Plaintiff:
Tammy Fox
Defendant:
Lackawanna County, Patrick O'Malley, Jim Wansacz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HUTCHINSON v. SPAEDER et al
as 2:2016cv02322
Plaintiff:
SCHEIE HUTCHINSON
Defendant:
LEO SPAEDER , WILLIAMS , DILORENZO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLACK v. SCI-FAYETTE et al
as 2:2016cv00219
Plaintiff:
DAVID J. BLACK
Defendant:
SCI-FAYETTE, RICHARD WORKMAN, ROBERT JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. PHILADELPHIA DAILY NEWS et al
as 2:2016cv00634
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA DAILY NEWS , PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER , PHILLY.COM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRETT v. SUNDAY BREAKFAST MISSION et al
as 2:2015cv05932
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
SUNDAY BREAKFAST MISSION, SAM PLATE, HUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
