Cases 41 - 50 of 52
ANKNEY v. WAKEFIELD et al
as 2:2010cv01290
Plaintiff:
BRAD ANKNEY
Defendant:
BARBARA WAKEFIELD and ATHENA PETROLIAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv02940
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harinarain v. Stroyan et al
as 3:2010cv01083
Plaintiff:
Harish Harinarain, Sr.
Defendant:
Kevin Stroyan, Mark Pizzuti, James Travis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SKILES v. CITY OF READING et al
as 5:2010cv02270
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SKILES
Defendant:
CITY OF READING , THOMAS MCMAHON , BRAD REINHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson et al v. Board of Control of the City of Harrisburg School District et al
as 1:2010cv00353
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Wilson, Karl Singleton, Shirley Jackson and others
Defendant:
Board of Control of the City of Harrisburg School District, Calobe Jackson, Jr., Les Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
CLARK v. FOLEY, et al
as 2:2008cv01306
Plaintiff:
MARY ANN CLARK
Defendant:
KEVIN FOLEY, KEVIN FOLEY, KEVIN FOLEY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FATH v. BOROUGH OF CORAOPOLIS et al
as 2:2008cv01216
Plaintiff:
SALLY A. FATH
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF CORAOPOLIS, CORAOPOLIS BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, SHAWN QUINN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Clark v. Foley et al
as 1:2008cv00689
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Clark
Defendant:
Kevin Foley, Michele Yelenic, Brian Bono and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Tomasovitch v. Cinram Manufacturing, Inc.
as 3:2007cv01942
Plaintiff:
Brad Tomasovitch and Brad Tomasovitch
Defendant:
Cinram Manufacturing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
MARTIN et al v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 2:2007cv02965
Plaintiff:
EARL MARTIN and BARBARA MARTIN
Defendant:
CITY OF LANCASTER and BRAD ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
