Cases 41 - 50 of 121
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00954
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv02232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
v. Marquardt et al
as 9:2016cv00115
Defendant:
Robert Scott Marquardt, Robert L Marquardt, Lyle Parry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramey v. Livingston et al
as 3:2016cv00293
Defendant:
A.C.N.P. Robert B Armstrong, L.V.N. Jacob E. Barron, L.V.N. Ana Chavez and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Ramey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Ross et al v. Hopkins County Texas et al
as 4:2016cv00095
Plaintiff:
Shelley Ross , Tony Ross and Estate of Tony Chance Ross
Defendant:
Hopkins County Texas , City of Sulphur Springs, Texas , Brad Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00346
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Comeaux et al v. Bittle et al
as 2:2015cv00332
Plaintiff:
Tevin Comeaux and Lakisha Antoine
Defendant:
Charles Bittle, Linda Simmons, Martine Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ellis v. State of Texas T.D.C.J. Parole Division et al
as 1:2015cv00999
Defendant:
Adelaida Almazan, Patricia Fleming, Stuart Jenkins and others
Plaintiff:
David John Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv03139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Woolverton v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 2:2015cv00314
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thomas Woolverton
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Brad Livingston, Barry Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
