Cases 41 - 50 of 1,275
Dearmin v. City of Cle Elum
as 1:2023cv03165
Plaintiff:
Paul D Dearmin
Defendant:
City of Cle Elum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Rehn v. City of Seattle et al
as 2:2023cv01609
Plaintiff:
Elisabeth Rehn
Defendant:
City of Seattle, Riley Caufield, Younghun Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2023cv01585
Plaintiff:
Deshon Corsey
Defendant:
City of Seattle & Municipality
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Owen v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2023cv05894
Plaintiff:
Ronald Owen
Defendant:
State of Washington, Kitsap County and City of Bremerton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frerichs v. Spokane City Police Department
as 2:2023cv00277
Plaintiff:
Jared Frerichs
Defendant:
Spokane City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Steamboat Landing Homeowners Association v. City of Vancouver
as 3:2023cv05833
Plaintiff:
Steamboat Landing Homeowners Association
Defendant:
City of Vancouver, Washington and City of Vancouver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Dickens v. City of Bremerton et al
as 3:2023cv05825
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dickens
Defendant:
City of Bremerton, Samuel Houston and Steven Polonsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2023cv01421
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dickens
Defendant:
City of Bremerton, Samuel Houston and Steven Polonsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
