Cases 41 - 50 of 199
Caskey v. Fenton et al
as 2:2020cv01549
Plaintiff:
Terry Scott Caskey
Defendant:
The City of Columbus, Nathan Fenton and Charles R Harshbarger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Osborn v. City of Columbus et al
as 2:2020cv01229
Defendant:
Elijah Ladipo, Nicholas Geno, Brian Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Osborn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stevens et al v. City of Columbus, Ohio et al
as 2:2020cv01230
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Ohio and Timothy J. Noll
Plaintiff:
Andrew H. Stevens and Melanie Copenhaver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Lynch et al
as 2:2020cv00842
Defendant:
Community Support Housing, Employer of Columbus, Judy Lynch and others
Plaintiff:
Shamar W. Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Doe v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2020cv00459
Defendant:
Andrew K Mitchell, 1-10 Does and City of Columbus
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Icon Entertainment Group et al v. Rosser et al
as 2:2020cv00101
Plaintiff:
Icon Entertainment Group, Kahoots and 4522 Kenny Road LLC
Defendant:
Steven G. Rosser, John or Mary Doe 1, City of Columbus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson et al v. City of Columbus et al
as 2:2019cv05651
Defendant:
Joseph Barsotti, Alex Mottinger, David Schultz and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Sloan, Derryle Sloan and Jonathan Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DaSilva v. City of Columbus OH et al
as 2:2019cv05282
Defendant:
COLUMBUS CITY ATTORNEY ZACH KLEIN, COLUMBUS CITY ATTORNEY RICHARD PFEIFFER, ROBERT TOBIAS and others
Plaintiff:
Janniny DaSilva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Felton v. City of Columbus
as 2:2019cv05082
Defendant:
City of Columbus
Plaintiff:
Carnell B. Felton, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laile v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2019cv03689
Defendant:
Andrew K Mitchell, Doe 1-25, City of Columbus and others
Plaintiff:
Administrator mary m laile and Mary M. Laile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
