Cases 41 - 50 of 348
Colwell v. Portland Police Bureau et al
as 3:2022cv01163
Plaintiff:
Logan Colwell
Defendant:
Portland Police Bureau, City of Portland and Nicholas Bianchini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKenzie v. Portland Police Division
as 3:2022cv01140
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. McKenzie
Defendant:
Portland Police Division, City of Portland and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01961
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lomax v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv01079
Plaintiff:
Zipporah Lomax
Defendant:
City of Portland and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adan v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv01053
Plaintiff:
Halima Adan
Defendant:
City of Portland, Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chachka v. City Portland et al
as 3:2022cv01141
Plaintiff:
Philip Chachka
Defendant:
City of Portland and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sitbon v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv01148
Plaintiff:
Phillip Sitbon
Defendant:
City of Portland, Craig Lehman and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cameron v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv01043
Plaintiff:
Rachel Cameron
Defendant:
City of Portland and John Does 1-12
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sires v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv01046
Plaintiff:
Anne Sires
Defendant:
City of Portland and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dietzschold et al v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv00989
Plaintiff:
Dica Dietzschold and Grace Dietzschold
Defendant:
City of Portland, Jeffrey P. Dorn, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
