Cases 41 - 44 of 44
Educational Media Company at V v. Susan Swecker
as 08-1798
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EDUCATIONAL MEDIA COMPANY AT VIRGINIA TECH, INCORPORATED and CAVALIER DAILY, INCORPORATED, The Cavalier Daily, Incorporated
Defendant - Appellant:
SUSAN R. SWECKER, Commissioner, Virginia Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission, PAMELA O'BERRY EVANS, Commissioner, Virginia Alcohol Beverage Control Commission, W. CURTIS COLEBURN, III, Chief Operating Officer Virginia Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and others
Amicus Supporting Appellee:
THOMAS JEFFERSON CENTER FOR THE PROTECTION OF FREE EXPRESSION, STUDENT PRESS LAW CENTER and COLLEGE NEWSPAPER BUSINESS AND ADVERTISING MANAGERS
Bowers v. Scurry et al.
as 07-1382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENA BOWERS
Defendant - Appellee:
NAT SCURRY, in his official and individual capacity and LUCINDA CHILDS-WHITE, in her official and individual capacity
Defendant:
UVA, by its Rector and Visitors, LEONARD SANDRIDGE, in his official capacity as executive vice president and chief operating officer of the University of Virginia, and in his individual capacity and YOKE SAN REYNOLDS, in her official capacity as chief financial officer of the University of Virginia, and in her individual capacity
Arekat v. Donohue, et al
as 06-16074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MANSOUR AREKAT, individually and in his capacity as chief operating officer and owner of Arekat Pacific Security Inc., a Hawaii corporation dba A.P.I. Security, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
LEE D. DONOHUE, CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, LETHA DE CAIRES and others
Trifax Corp v. DC, et al
as 01-7195
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Trifax Corp, A District of Columbia Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia, A Municipal Corporation, Anthony A. Williams, Mayor of the District of Columbia, Office of Inspector General, An administrative agency of the District of Columbia and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
