Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv01174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv01051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Harte et al v. Denning et al
as 2:2013cv02586
Plaintiff:
Adlynn K. Harte and Robert W. Harte
Defendant:
Johnson County, Kansas Board of Commissioners , Frank Denning , Mark Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perkins v. University of Kansas Medical Center et al
as 2:2013cv02530
Plaintiff:
Diane E. Perkins
Defendant:
University of Kansas Medical Center, University of Kansas Board of Regents, University of Kansas Hospital Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Collingsworth v. Wilson County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 6:2013cv01355
Plaintiff:
Heather Collingsworth
Defendant:
Wilson County Board of County Commissioners , Pete Figgins , Daniel Bath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camick v. Wattley et al
as 2:2013cv02361
Plaintiff:
Leslie Lyle Camick
Defendant:
Evelyn A. Wattley , KaiTraxx, LLC , District Court of Cowley County, Winfield, Kansas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mettlen v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 5:2013cv04050
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Mettlen
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dale v. Harris et al
as 2:2012cv02789
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Dale
Defendant:
(fnu) Harris , (fnu) James , (fnu) Strogel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
