Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Gilley v. White et al
as 2:2012cv04304
Plaintiff:
Priscella Gilley
Defendant:
Greg White and Cole County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv01404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Walker v. Cole County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2011cv04330
Plaintiff:
Clifton Walker
Defendant:
Cole County Sheriff's Department and David F. Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkinson v. Barrett et al
as 2:2011cv04251
Plaintiff:
Brenda L. Wilkinson
Defendant:
David F. Barrett , Joshua Stockman , Greg White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cole v. United States Attorney General et al
as 6:2010cv00256
Plaintiff:
Jeanna Cole
Defendant:
United States Attorney General and United States Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Cole v. United States Attorney General et al
as 4:2010cv00256
Claimant:
Jeanna Cole
Defendant:
United States Attorney General and United States Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Wolfe et al v. State of Missouri et al
as 3:2009cv05031
Plaintiff:
Ray D. Wolfe and Jeremy Orr
Defendant:
State of Missouri, City of Cassville, Missouri, Andrew J. Hagar and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gash v. White et al
as 2:2008cv04245
Plaintiff:
Maurice L Gash
Defendant:
Greg White, Missouri Cole County, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jackson v. Schaffer et al
as 2:2008cv04035
Plaintiff:
Floyd Jackson
Defendant:
Keith Schaffer, Marty Martin, Felix Vincenz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
