Cases 41 - 50 of 119
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01480
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BUFORD v. COMMISSIONER, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2015cv00157
Plaintiff:
VALERIE BUFORD
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Matson v. Tippecanoe County et al
as 4:2014cv00079
Plaintiff:
Brenda Matson
Defendant:
Tippecanoe County , Tracy Brown , Judy Clerget and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00128
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lockett v. State of Indiana/Department of Corrections
as 3:2014cv01739
Plaintiff:
Marques R Lockett
Defendant:
Indiana State of Department of Corrections, Mark Sevier, K Ultle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Barhams v. Indiana Department of Correction
as 3:2014cv01578
Plaintiff:
Yolanda D Barhams
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Matson v. Tippecanoe County Indiana et al
as 4:2014cv00014
Defendant:
Tippecanoe County Indiana , Tippecanoe Sheriff's Department , Tracy Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda Matson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
