Cases 41 - 50 of 374
GUERRIER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv02283
Plaintiff:
Gerald Guerrier
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
SHEKAR v. DUFF et al
as 1:2022cv02123
Defendant:
STEVE GILMAN, JOAQUIN ARCHIVALDO GUZMAN, JAMES DUFF and others
Plaintiff:
ROGER SHEKAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CREAMER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2022cv01874
Plaintiff:
Karen Creamer, Jane Dalen, Mary Moody and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Mayor MURIEL BOWSER, DC HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BARBOUR v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2022cv01844
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE BARBOUR
Defendant:
DAMIEN WILLIAMS, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLORENDO-ONG v. IL-USA et al
as 1:2022cv01596
Plaintiff:
TRISTAN FLORENDO-ONG
Defendant:
116th/117th US CONGRESSIONAL 535 MEMBERS, 177 MEMBERS IL G.A., CECILIA ABUNDIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
PERCIVAL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv01506
Plaintiff:
MARITA V. PERCIVAL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOHN DOES 1-10, JOHN DOES 11-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
DOE v. USA
as 1:2022cv01337
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DOE et al v. 4 DISTRICT COURT JUDGES
as 1:2022cv01424
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE and JOHN DOE
Defendant:
4 DISTRICT COURT JUDGES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CARMER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv01100
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH CARMER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MARK ADAMCHIK, JOHN DOE OFFICER 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
