Cases 41 - 50 of 117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00757
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Martin v. County of Franklin, Tennessee et al
as 4:2018cv00048
Defendant:
Kason Bolin, Allen Rhodes, Paul Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johns et al v. The City of Franklin,Tennessee et al
as 3:2017cv00924
Plaintiff:
James E. Johns and Karen L. Johns
Defendant:
The City of Franklin,Tennessee, Elijah Valimont and Adam Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Garth v. Hommrich et al
as 3:2017cv00758
Plaintiff:
Tracy Marie Garth , ACB and CAB
Defendant:
Bonnie Hommrich, Emily Kirby, Sara Fischer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. U.S Merit Systems Protection Board
as 2:2017cv00040
Plaintiff:
Robert D Franklin
Defendant:
U.S Merit Systems Protection Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Blanchard et al v. City Of Memphis, Tennessee
as 2:2017cv02120
Plaintiff:
Elaine Blanchard , Keedran Franklin , Paul Garner and others
Defendant:
City Of Memphis, Tennessee
Intervenor_plaintiff:
ACLU of Tennessee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Blanchard et al v. Franklin et al
as 2:2017cv02119
Plaintiff:
Elaine Blanchard, Paul Garner and Bradley Watkins
Defendant:
Keedran Franklin and City Of Memphis, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danes v. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00182
Plaintiff:
Michael Franklin Danes
Defendant:
Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Lewis et al v. The City of Memphis et al
as 2:2017cv02036
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lewis , Keedran Franklin , Earle Fisher and others
Defendant:
The City of Memphis and Elvis Presley Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
