Cases 41 - 50 of 57
ALBINGER et al v. THE TOWNSHIP OF WEST DEER et al
as 2:2010cv01573
Plaintiff:
CHERYL ALBINGER and PAMELA ALBINGER
Defendant:
THE TOWNSHIP OF WEST DEER, JONATHON LAPE, JESSE HASCHAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HART v. TANNERY et al
as 2:2010cv03675
Plaintiff:
JOHN HART
Defendant:
BROOKE TANNERY, CHRISTOPHER FERRY and HILLTOWN TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv03112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv01866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
BURNS v. DICHTER et al
as 2:2010cv00522
Plaintiff:
MELISSA M. BURNS
Defendant:
HARRIET DICHTER and RAYMOND S. HART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ABDULLAH v. THOMAS JEFFERSON HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2010cv01532
Plaintiff:
WALIYYUDDIN S. ABDULLAH
Defendant:
THOMAS JEFFERSON HOSPITAL, GOCIAL and HART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Smith v. United States Of America et al
as 4:2010cv00500
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Smith
Defendant:
United States Of America, Thomas F. Hogan, Patrick J. Attridge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HUTCHINSON v. HART et al
as 2:2009cv01624
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE HUTCHINSON
Defendant:
DEWAYNE C. HART, CITY OF PITTSBURGH, PITTSBURGH BUREAU OF POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
COLLINS v. BOYD et al
as 1:2009cv01599
Plaintiff:
Ed Collins
Defendant:
KEVIN FRIEL, James Hart, SALLIE RODGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FUREY v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2009cv02474
Plaintiff:
KEVIN FUREY
Defendant:
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY, THERESA A. POWELL, ANNE WEAVER HART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
