Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Arnold v. Carter et al
as 2:2011cv00492
Plaintiff:
Dearilo V. Arnold
Defendant:
Earl N. Carter, Jr. and Heather Hartley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv02827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 rt Job Discrimination/Retaliation
Delander v. Medical Staffing Network, Inc.
as 2:2009cv02010
Plaintiff:
Heather Lynne Delander
Defendant:
Medical Staffing Network, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
D. v. Chilton County Board of Education et al
as 2:2009cv00691
Plaintiff:
D. D.
Defendant:
Chilton County Board of Education, Keith Moore, Benita Cahalane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cain v. Mental Health Center of North Central Alabama, Inc et al
as 5:2009cv00416
Plaintiff:
Victoria Cain
Defendant:
Mental Health Center of North Central Alabama, Inc, Linda Pierce and Heather Stone
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Moody et al v. City of Birmingham et al
as 2:2008cv02146
Plaintiff:
Susan Moody, Susan Moody, Jennifer Stitt and others
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, City of Birmingham, Carole Smitherman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Timberlake v. Scottsboro, Alabama, City of et al
as 5:2008cv01829
Plaintiff:
Nicole Timberlake
Defendant:
Scottsboro, Alabama, City of, Ralph Dawe, Mike Godfrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
