Cases 41 - 50 of 74
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2016cv00579
Plaintiff:
Sasha J Jackson
Defendant:
Snohomish County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv05060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Franco Fish Products, Inc. et al v. Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife et al
as 3:2015cv05179
Plaintiff:
Franco Fish Products, Inc. , Ronald G. Burdick and Douglas W. Chaney
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife , Michael Cenci , Jason Czebotar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jackson et al v. Spokane County et al
as 2:2014cv00142
Plaintiff:
Tvar L Jackson , Barry J Gardner and Israel L Jones
Defendant:
Spokane County Washington , Steven Kyle Treece and Steve Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Gain et al
as 2:2014cv00597
Plaintiff:
Michael A Jackson
Defendant:
Brian Gain, Cindi S Port and Debra Redford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Spector et al
as 2:2013cv00790
Plaintiff:
Michael A Jackson
Defendant:
Julie A Spector, Cindi S Port, Debra Redford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mason et al v. City of Lake Forest Park et al
as 2:2013cv00676
Plaintiff:
Michele Mason and Michael Gilmore
Defendant:
City of Lake Forest Park, Tony Matthews, Steven Parken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Port et al
as 2:2013cv00098
Plaintiff:
Michael A Jackson
Defendant:
Cindi S Port, Debra Redford, Terri A. Pollock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
