Cases 41 - 50 of 176
Hendrix v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv01348
Defendant:
Oshobe, Mr. Lisacth, Deputy Warden Timothy Shoop and others
Plaintiff:
Homer Hendrix, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kepperling v. Kepperling et al
as 3:2019cv00001
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-100, Elizabeth Kepperling, Justin Hovan and others
Plaintiff:
Angela Kepperling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00345
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harrison v. Scott et al
as 2:2018cv01023
Defendant:
Natalie McCown, Mohamed Hashi Abib, John and/or Jane Does 6-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Spragling, II v. Akron Public Schools et al
as 5:2018cv01969
Defendant:
Superintendent Jeff Ferguson, Akron Public Schools, Tallmadge City Schools and others
Plaintiff:
Ned Spragling, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Ervin et al
as 1:2018cv00142
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harris
Defendant:
Michael Ervin, Ronald Erdos and John and/or Jane Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
White v. vanBibber et al
as 2:2018cv00159
Plaintiff:
Richard White
Defendant:
Josh vanBibber, Hocking County Commissioners, Morgan County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Durham v. Niffenegger et al
as 1:2018cv00091
Plaintiff:
David Durham
Defendant:
Jerry Niffenegger, Mark Purdy, James Christian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHN DOE 1 et al v. CHIQUITA BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv00054
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 , Jane Doe #1 , John Doe #3 and others
Defendant:
Chiquita Brands International Inc , MOE CORPORATIONS 1-10, MOES 11-25 and others
Movant:
Roderick M. Hills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartley v. Collins et al
as 2:2017cv01091
Plaintiff:
Pam Hartley
Defendant:
Jamarkus Collins, Katrina Hallam, Sasha Day and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
