Cases 41 - 50 of 165
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
DUPREY v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2016cv01314
Plaintiff:
ALEX DUPREY
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JEFFREY WALKER, BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSSI v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2015cv06540
Plaintiff:
CARMEN ROSSI
Defendant:
BRIAN REYNOLDS, JOHN SPEISER, JEFREY WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WELCH v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2015cv06538
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WELCH
Defendant:
BRIAN REYNOLDS, JOHN SPEISER, JEFREY WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWEN v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2015cv06539
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BOWEN
Defendant:
BRIAN REYNOLDS, JOHN SPEISER, JEFREY WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOSTIC et al v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2015cv06479
Plaintiff:
DOMINIC BOSTIC , SHERRON HILL , DERRICK QUADENFIELD and others
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JEFFREY WALKER, PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv08479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Grottano et al v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2015cv09242
Plaintiff:
A. R. , Dana Grottano and N. D.
Defendant:
City Of New York, Joseph Ponte, Jane Mayweather and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REIBER et al v. FILLIPONE et al
as 2:2015cv06192
Plaintiff:
HELEN REIBER and HEATHER HUGHES
Defendant:
STEVEN FILLIPONE, JOSE PEREZ, PENTHOUSE CLUB@PHILLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOBE et al v. SOTO et al
as 2:2015cv06014
Plaintiff:
IVONNE BOBE and LAURA MONTALVO
Defendant:
MICHAEL A. SOTO, POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOES 1-25, POLICE OFFICERS JANE DOES 1-25 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
