Civil Rights Cases filed in Minnesota
Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Wagamon et al v. Hawley et al
as 0:2011cv03539
Plaintiff: Patrick J. Wagamon and Cathy L. Wagamon
Defendant: Tim Hawley , Matt Carlson , Angie Wahl and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Herbert et al v. Obama et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2011cv01869
Plaintiff: Susan Herbert, Brian Dobry, Frederick Webbe and others
Defendant: Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2011cv00926
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Magnan et al v. Officer John Doe et al
as 0:2011cv00753
Plaintiff: Tonya Magnan and Susan Hendrickson
Defendant: Officer John Doe , Officer Joe Smith , Officer Jane Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2008cv06236
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Mendez et al v. Faribault Foods, Inc.
as 0:2007cv03986
Plaintiff: Francisco Mendez, Francisco Mendez, Walter Perez and others
Defendant: Faribault Foods, Inc., Faribault Foods, Inc. and Faribault Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Moreno et al v. Work Connection, The
as 0:2007cv03985
Plaintiff: Alicia Moreno, Alicia Moreno, Jose Barragan and others
Defendant: Work Connection, The and Work Connection, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Perkins v. City of Chaska et al
as 0:2007cv01608
Plaintiff: Edwin Leroy Perkins and Edwin Leroy Perkins
Defendant: City of Chaska, City of Chaska, Josh Lawrenz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?