Cases 41 - 50 of 275
Jordan v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv00942
Plaintiff:
LaVonne Jordan
Defendant:
City of Portland, Jason Worthington and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santiago v. Tykol et al
as 6:2021cv01715
Plaintiff:
Ofelia Hernandez Santiago
Defendant:
Samuel Tykol, City of Eugene, John Doe Supervisors 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wrecksie v. Multnomah County et al
as 3:2022cv00891
Plaintiff:
Lester Wrecksie
Defendant:
Multnomah County Multnomah County, City of Portland, John Does 1-12 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv00867
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Johnson
Defendant:
City of Portland, Oregon, Multnomah County Multnomah County, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv01080
Plaintiff:
Angelica Erika Clark
Defendant:
City of Portland and John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Moon v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv00758
Defendant:
Marisa Moon, City of Portland, John Doe 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv00927
Plaintiff:
Damesha Smith
Defendant:
City of Portland and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Opbroek v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv00610
Plaintiff:
Meghan Opbroek
Defendant:
City of Portland, John Doe 1-2, Zachary Domka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Lake et al
as 3:2022cv00817
Defendant:
Bea Lake, City of Portland and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pearce v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
Dexter Pearce
Defendant:
City of Portland and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
