Cases 41 - 50 of 426
Kelly v. Bell et al
as 4:2022cv01940
Plaintiff:
Farrah Kelly
Defendant:
Joshua Bell, Justin Snyder and City of Williamsport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KELLI v. HOMESTEAD POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 2:2022cv01585
Plaintiff:
SMITH L. KELLI and KELLI L. SMITH
Defendant:
HOMESTEAD POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv04029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
REEVE v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv03936
Plaintiff:
OMAR REEVE
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER REYNOLDS, PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HORTON et al v. RANGOS et al
as 2:2022cv01391
Plaintiff:
DION HORTON, DAMON JONES, CRAIG BROWNLEE and others
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE JILL RANGOS, FRANK SCHERER, ANTHONY MARIANI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
SMITH v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC
as 2:2022cv01147
Plaintiff:
KELLI-L SMITH
Defendant:
PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
KELLY EL v. LITWIN
as 2:2022cv02893
Plaintiff:
GENE P. KELLY EL
Defendant:
JUDGE LEANNE L. LITWIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
