Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Rivero et al v. Montgomery County, Maryland et al
as 8:2016cv01186
Plaintiff:
Nohora Rivero and Legal Aid Bureau, Inc.
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Maryland , J Thomas Manger , Alexander Kettering and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walker v. Prince George's County, Maryland et al
as 8:2015cv02274
Plaintiff:
Leaford Walker
Defendant:
Prince George's County, Maryland , K. Lewis , Willie Stover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schloss et al v. Lewis et al
as 1:2015cv01938
Plaintiff:
Toney A. Schloss and Stuart Schloss
Defendant:
Michael Lewis and William R. Abey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones et al v. Chapman et al
as 1:2014cv02627
Plaintiff:
Tawanda Jones , Nashay West , Tyrone West, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Nicholas David Chapman , Jorge Omar Bernardez-Ruiz , Matthew Rea Cioffi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Solomon v. Kess-Lewis et al
as 1:2013cv02632
Plaintiff:
Cargyle Brown Solomon
Defendant:
Shareese Kess-Lewis and Randolph T. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lewis v. Chizuk Amuno Congregation et al
as 1:2013cv02206
Plaintiff:
Junior Lewis
Defendant:
Chizuk Amuno Congregation, Mark Neustadt and Ronald Millen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
