Cases 41 - 49 of 49
LOGAN v. UNIDENTIFIED DEFENDANTS et al
as 2:2011cv03645
Plaintiff:
LLOYD LOGAN, JR.
Defendant:
UNIDENTIFIED DEFENDANTS and HOUSING URBAN DENGURED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Matthews v. Runco's Tavern & Grill, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv01215
Plaintiff:
Richard Matthews
Defendant:
Runco's Tavern & Grill, Inc., Marc Runco, Thomas J. Logan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv01502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOGAN et al v. SALEM BAPTIST CHURCH OF JENKINTOWN et al
as 2:2010cv00144
Plaintiff:
WALTER J. LOGAN, JR. and THE DELTA ALLIANCE, LLC
Defendant:
SALEM BAPTIST CHURCH OF JENKINTOWN, EASTBURN & GRAY, P.C., JANE E. LEOPOLD-LEVENTHAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BANKS v. CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2008cv03945
Plaintiff:
RYAN BANKS
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, BYERS BAXTER, RICHARD CUJDIK and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv03386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
HEMLOCK CROSSING, LLC v. LOGAN TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2007cv00026
Plaintiff:
HEMLOCK CROSSING, LLC, AMY HOLSINGER, CARLA PENNABAKER and others
Defendant:
LOGAN TOWNSHIP, LOGAN TOWNSHIP, LOGAN TOWNSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
