Cases 41 - 50 of 60
SMITH et al v. INDIANA COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2012cv00728
Plaintiff:
MARANDA SMITH and LANE N. SHELSTAD
Defendant:
INDIANA COUNTY JAIL , COUNTY OF INDIANA , MARGARET DAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weil v. White et al
as 4:2012cv00413
Plaintiff:
Stephen Weil
Defendant:
David L. White , Walt Eisenhauer , Anna Mae Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv05131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ANORUO v. HAHNEMANN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2011cv03915
Plaintiff:
DARLENE LANE ANORUO
Defendant:
HAHNEMANN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, DAVID BERKSON, JULIE YEH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00996
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
PARKS et al v. TOWNSHIP OF PORTAGE, CAMBRIA COUNTY et al
as 3:2010cv00075
Plaintiff:
DONALD M. PARKS, JR., JOHN W. PARKS, ARLENE PARKS and others
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF PORTAGE, CAMBRIA COUNTY, CALVIN J. WEBB, JR., LISA FLYNN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
55 KENMORE LANE LLC v. UPPER PROVIDENCE TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2010cv01089
Plaintiff:
55 KENMORE LANE LLC
Defendant:
UPPER PROVIDENCE TOWNSHIP and UPPER PROVIDENCE TOWNSHIP SEWER AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
