Cases 41 - 50 of 139
Stewart, Timothy v. Banks, Andrew et al
as 3:2022cv00483
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Stewart, Sr.
Defendant:
Andrew P. Banks, Ofc. John Doe #1, Ofc. John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stewart, Timothy v. Banks, Andrew et al
as 3:2022cv00482
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Stewart, Sr.
Defendant:
Andrew P. Banks, Ronald Sutherland, Jim Ardnt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Holifield et al v. Rivamonte et al
as 2:2022cv00742
Plaintiff:
Al Holifield, Cora Lee Holifield, Edward Holifield and others
Defendant:
Jon Rivamonte, Miguel Correa, Karl Zuberbier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Marraksh, Abu Talib Al v. O'Donnell, Cindy et al
as 3:2022cv00279
Plaintiff:
Abu Talib Al Marraksh and Lee Crouthers
Defendant:
Cindy O'Donnell, Brad Hompe, Jeffrey Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Stewart, Timothy v. Holmes, Jessica et al
as 3:2021cv00764
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Stewart, Sr.
Defendant:
Jessica Holmes, Sarah Liedholdt, Police Officer Woodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haeuser v. LEE Enterprises
as 2:2021cv01338
Plaintiff:
Charles R Haeuser
Defendant:
LEE Enterprises
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
