Civil Rights Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 41 - 50 of 83
PALMER v. BENSALEM TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2017cv02632
Plaintiff: MAURICE PALMER
Defendant: BENSALEM TOWNSHIP , ADORNO , SCHWARTING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02294
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01229
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SHOATZ v. FARRELL et al
as 2:2016cv03021
Plaintiff: MAURICE SHOATZ
Defendant: MICHELLE FARRELL, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10, CYNTHIA LINK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERRY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv02795
Plaintiff: MAURICE PERRY
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and CHRISTOPHER HULMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv04207
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MORRISON v. SUTHERLAND et al
as 2:2015cv03267
Plaintiff: CYNTHIA MORRISON
Defendant: MAURICE SUTHERLAND, DIONNE MADISON and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALLACE v. UNKNOWN OFFICERS et al
as 2:2015cv01857
Plaintiff: MAURICE WALLACE
Defendant: WHITE, UNKNOWN OFFICERS and THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JUSTE v. RESIDENT AGENCY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00140
Plaintiff: ANDRE JUSTE and MOT JUSTE TIRADE OF VIM ANDRE JUSTE
Defendant: RESIDENT AGENCY, PATRICT MAURICE, EDWARD J. HANKO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
KANE v. DOZOR et al
as 2:2014cv06492
Plaintiff: GERALD MAURICE KANE
Defendant: BARRY C. DOZOR, MARY MCFALL HOPPER and WILLIAM C. MACKRIDES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?