Cases 41 - 50 of 56
ALSMAN v. COUNTY OF KNOX et al
as 2:2012cv00233
Plaintiff:
ROBERT G. ALSMAN
Defendant:
OFFICER ERIC COONRAD, COUNTY OF KNOX, OFFICER CHARLES HELDERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bickett v. Lake County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2012cv00091
Plaintiff:
Devin Bickett
Defendant:
Lake County Sheriff Department , Lake County Corrections Division , John Buncich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MCCORMICK v. KNOX COUNTY INDIANA et al
as 2:2012cv00048
Defendant:
JARRETT FORD, KNOX COUNTY INDIANA, KNOX COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCCORMICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RENEHAN v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK et al
as 2:2011cv00292
Defendant:
FIRST NATIONAL BANK and MORRIS PLAN
Plaintiff:
RODNEY ALLEN RENEHAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00160
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Objector:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
MORRIS v. TEMPLE INLAND
as 1:2009cv01168
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE MORRIS
Defendant:
TEMPLE INLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
MATTINGLY et al v. CITY OF NEW ALBANY
as 4:2009cv00051
Plaintiff:
JOHN MATTINGLY, JOHN MATTINGLY, SAMANTHA MORRIS and others
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW ALBANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
