Cases 41 - 50 of 60
CASTRO v. CFCF PRISON SYSTEM
as 2:2012cv00476
Plaintiff:
JOSE A. CASTRO
Defendant:
CFCF PRISON SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv07642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
RIVERA v. BLACK et al
as 2:2011cv06221
Plaintiff:
JUAN E. RIVERA
Defendant:
BRIAN BLACK, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DESOUSA v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv05380
Plaintiff:
ALVAIR DESOUSA
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, 55TH DISTRICT DETECTIVE ACKERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ISLAM v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv03538
Plaintiff:
HAKIM ISLAM
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, PHILA. HOUSE OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AYERS v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2011cv03099
Plaintiff:
MELVIN AYRES
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, LOUIS GIORLA and DARRYL ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Szakacs et al
as 5:2010cv01048
Plaintiff:
Ryan Carter
Defendant:
Joseph Szakacs, Onondaga County, City of Syracuse Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEFLEY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv03896
Plaintiff:
GARY B. HEFLEY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSH v. PHILA PRISON SYSTEMS
as 2:2010cv03541
Plaintiff:
JOHN RUSH
Defendant:
PHILA PRISON SYSTEMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SAWYER v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2010cv03229
Plaintiff:
ANDRE J. SAWYER
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM and CURRAN - FROMHOLD CORR. FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
