Cases 41 - 50 of 2,659
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Muhammad v. Office of Management and Budget, et al
as 3:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Jamil Abdul Muhammad
Defendant:
Office of Management and Budget, Shalanda D. Young and Jason S. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
MacDonald v. Great Neck Park District et al
as 2:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
Scott MacDonald
Defendant:
Great Neck Park District, Frank S. Cilluffo and Jason Marra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Washington v. Coixie Green State Prison et al
as 1:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Charmeen D. Washington
Defendant:
Coixie Green State Prison, Prisoner Temaine Hamilton, Sherraina S. Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell v. City of Binghamton, NY et al
as 3:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
David J. Campbell
Defendant:
City of Binghamton, NY, Jared M. Kraham, Binghamton Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
