Cases 41 - 50 of 603
Graham v. Massey et al
as 2:2023cv00255
Plaintiff:
Jerome D. Graham, Sr.
Defendant:
Judge Massey, Chief Judge Devon R. Paige, Judge Robert M. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Smith v. Sequoia Benefits and Insurance Services, LLC, et al.
as 3:2023cv00242
Plaintiff:
Justice Smith
Defendant:
Sequoia Benefits and Insurance Services, LLC and Greg Golub
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Pendelton v. Miyares et al
as 1:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Pendleton
Defendant:
Jason Miyares, Louise DiMatteo, Commissioners of Virginia Deparment of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00434
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
