Cases 41 - 50 of 782
Russell v. Flores, et al.
as 4:2023cv00992
Plaintiff:
Amanda Russell
Defendant:
Zachary Flores, Jason Jeffcoat, Brian McClaran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv00395
Plaintiff:
Joseph P. Smith
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland and U.S. Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McCaffety v. Hanson et al
as 4:2023cv04019
Plaintiff:
Don McCaffety
Defendant:
Kelsey Hanson, Jodi Watkins, Randy Parasiliti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Joseph P. Smith
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland and U.S. Marshals Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tilt Vision Studios, LLC et al v. City of Waller, Texas
as 4:2023cv03864
Plaintiff:
Tilt Vision Studios, LLC, Kay Ray and Brad Smith
Defendant:
City of Waller, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rupe et al v. The City of Jacksboro, Texas
as 4:2023cv00998
Plaintiff:
Johnny D. Rupe, Sherry J Rupe and Johnny D Rupe
Defendant:
The City of Jacksboro, Texas and Michael R Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Grosskopf et al
as 6:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
Cole Smith
Defendant:
Timothy Grosskopf, Joshua Snowden, Braden Rich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 5:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
Franklin Smith
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Elite Combatant Special Units, Oklahoma City and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Isom
as 4:2023cv00805
Plaintiff:
Tanner Smith
Defendant:
Haven Isom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
