Cases 41 - 47 of 47
RUARK et al v. SECRETARY OF THE INDIANA FAMILY AND SOCIAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2012cv00269
Defendant:
DIRECTOR OF THE DIVISION OF DISABILITY AND REHAB. SERVICES OF THE INDIANA FAMILY AND SOCIAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION and SECRETARY OF THE INDIANA FAMILY AND SOCIAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
KENNETH KOZLOWSKI and JACQUELINE RUARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FREEMAN v. INDIANA FAMILY AND SOCIAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION et al
as 4:2011cv00145
Defendant:
DESIGNEE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE INDIANA FAMILY AND SOCIAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, INDIANA FAMILY AND SOCIAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION and SECRETARY OF THE INDIANA FAMILY AND SOCIAL SERVICES ADMINSTRATION
Plaintiff:
SALLY FREEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA, INC. et al v. COMMISSIONER OF THE INDIANA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH et al
as 1:2011cv00630
Plaintiff:
CARLA CLEARY, C.N.M, LETITIA CLEMONS, DEJIONA JACKSON and others
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, COMMISSIONER OF THE INDIANA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, DIRECTOR OF THE INDIANA STATE BUDGET AGENCY and others
Amicu:
INDIANA GENERAL ASSEMBLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harper v. Secretary of Veteran Affairs
as 3:2007cv00545
Plaintiff:
Charles Harper
Defendant:
Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
