Cases 41 - 50 of 443
Bey v. Watson et al
as 3:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Richard Amun'Ra Bey
Defendant:
Michael Watson, Lynn Fitch, Chris Grahm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Nunn v. Dickerson
as 1:2022cv00034
Plaintiff:
Archie Nunn
Defendant:
State Trooper John M. Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wooten v. State of Mississippi Department of Human Services
as 3:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Ella Louise Wooten
Defendant:
State of Mississippi Department of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bowlin v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Leslie Bowlin
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Burl Cain, Marc McClure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hall v. United States et al
as 4:2021cv00173
Plaintiff:
Arizona Hall, Jr.
Defendant:
United States, John Does, Phil Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Drake v. Mercedes Benz USA, LLC. et al
as 3:2021cv00251
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake and Eric *DO NOT FILE* Drake
Defendant:
Mercedes Benz USA, LLC., Best Buy Co., Inc., Corie Barry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bradley v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2021cv00212
Plaintiff:
Shamar Bradley
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, County of Lafayette and City of Oxford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bey v. Jordan et al
as 3:2021cv00576
Plaintiff:
Richard Amun'Ra Bey
Defendant:
Chief Judge Daniel P. Jordan, Judge F. Keith Ball, Clerk Arthur Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
