Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Watkins et al v. Homewood, City of et al
as 2:2010cv00324
Plaintiff:
Lavares Watkins, Curtis Tucker and Kalvin Lowe
Defendant:
Homewood, City of, Phillip Dodd, John Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hirsch v. Mathews et al
as 5:2010cv00134
Plaintiff:
Arthur Hirsch
Defendant:
William Mathews , Sandra Tucker , Ricky Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tucker v. City of Florence, Alabama et al
as 3:2009cv01786
Plaintiff:
Brenda Hawkins Tucker
Defendant:
City of Florence, Alabama, Lauderdale County, Alabama, The Lauderdale County Drug Task Force and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tucker v. Dallas County Commission
as 2:2008cv00174
Plaintiff:
Randall Tucker
Defendant:
Dallas County Commission
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Orr v. Decatur, City of, Alabama et al
as 5:2007cv00496
Plaintiff:
Lorna Orr
Defendant:
Decatur, City of, Alabama, Joel Gilliam, Steve Condo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
