Cases 41 - 50 of 114
Lohman v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv01142
Defendant:
Wexford, County of, Environmental Protection Agency, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality and others
Plaintiff:
Robert James Lohman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00918
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Undetermined:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rissman v. United States of America et al
as 2:2018cv11557
Plaintiff:
Ronald Allan Rissman
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
United States of America v. Tjoelker
as 1:2017cv00883
Defendant:
Frank Tjoelker
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Amponsah v. Trump
as 2:2017cv12950
Plaintiff:
Mabel Amponsah
Defendant:
Donald Trump, The Pesidents of United States of America, Barak Obama and others
Krueger v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv10574
Plaintiff:
Brian Krueger
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edkins v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv00142
Plaintiff:
Charles Edkins
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Eastpointe, City of et al
as 2:2017cv10079
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Eastpointe, City of, Eastpointe City Council, Suzanne Pixley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Sterling Heights, City of
as 2:2016cv14366
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sterling Heights, City of
Currie v. Andrews et al
as 2:2016cv14153
Plaintiff:
Marlon Currie
Defendant:
Thomas Andrews, Michigan, State of, United States of America and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
