Civil Rights Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02012
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
ALEXANDER v. WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2015cv00120
Plaintiff: KENNETH ALEXANDER
Defendant: CLAUDE C. COMBS, UNKNOWN OFFICER OR DEPUTY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF and WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00206
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00325
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BYNUM v. WASHINGTON SQUARE MALL, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00188
Defendant: TARGET CORPORATION, D&K RETAIL PROPERTIES, LLC and WASHINGTON SQUARE MALL, LLC
Plaintiff: KAREEM BYNUM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BYNUM v. WASHINGTON PLAZA ASSOCIATES, LP
as 1:2013cv00185
Defendant: WASHINGTON PLAZA ASSOCIATES, LP
Plaintiff: KAREEM BYNUM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Washington v. Fort Wayne Housing Authority
as 1:2012cv00182
Plaintiff: Christopher E Washington
Defendant: Fort Wayne Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Direct Express We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00393
Plaintiff: Christopher E Washington
Defendant: Direct Express
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Chau et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00395
Plaintiff: Christopher E Washington
Defendant: Dr Julie Chau, Dr Charles Coats, Dr Joseph Fortin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00328
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?