Cases 51 - 60 of 614
BECKER v. HOWARD et al
as 2:2022cv00970
Plaintiff:
ROBERT H. BECKER
Defendant:
ZACKERY HOWARD, TOM ANKROM and BOROUGH OF WAYNESBURG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
3Rd Party Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Harmon v. Rock et al
as 1:2022cv00847
Plaintiff:
James E. Harmon
Defendant:
Todd A. Rock, Donna B. Reese, Tinna M. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vought v. Tonkin et al
as 3:2022cv00506
Plaintiff:
Erica Rose Vought
Defendant:
Ray Tonkin, Esquire Bruce DeSarro, Gregory H. Chelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
KOVALEV v. LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA, et al.
as 2:2022cv00552
Defendant:
LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA, LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS, LABCORP and others
Plaintiff:
SERGEI KOVALEV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wassel v. Torbeck et al
as 3:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Paul J. Wassel, Jr.
Defendant:
Eric Richard Torbeck, Gregory H. Chelak, Raymond J. Tonkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ewell v. Vanston
as 3:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Ronald H. Ewell
Defendant:
Doug Vanston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
