Cases 51 - 60 of 73
BROWN et al v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 2:2011cv06738
Plaintiff:
MARUNDAH X. BROWN and CLETIS DARNELL BROWN
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY , ROBERT MEYERS , PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv06423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv03206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MUCHA v. BOEHM et al
as 5:2011cv00624
Plaintiff:
JOHN JULIUS MUCHA
Defendant:
JAMES BOEHM , TODD BUSKIRK , WILLIAM SWEENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CALIPO v. BUTLER COUNTY CRANBERRY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2010cv00298
Plaintiff:
JULIA CALIPO
Defendant:
BUTLER COUNTY CRANBERRY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT , BOB ONEILL , EVANSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Estate of Larry Berry, Jr. et al v. Eastern Pike Regional Police Department et al
as 3:2010cv02538
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Larry Berry, Jr. and Shirley Berry
Defendant:
Eastern Pike Regional Police Department, Easter Pike Regional Police Commission, Chad Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv07028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GRAU et al v. NEW KENSINGTON-ARNOLD SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2010cv00111
Plaintiff:
COLIN GRAU, SCOTT GRAU and BRENDA GRAU
Defendant:
NEW KENSINGTON-ARNOLD SCHOOL DISTRICT, ROBERT PALLONE, ROBERT SAURO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
