Cases 51 - 60 of 105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
McLaughlin et al v. Tiverton Town Council et al
as 1:2016cv00648
Plaintiff:
William C McLaughlin and Deborah McLaughlin
Defendant:
Tiverton Town Council, Town of Tiverton, Denise deMedeiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kando v. Rhode Island Board of Elections et al
as 1:2016cv00511
Plaintiff:
Robert Kando
Defendant:
Rhode Island State Board of Elections, Richard R. Dubois, Diane L. Mederos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruiz v. State of Rhode Island, Rhode Island State Police et al
as 1:2016cv00507
Plaintiff:
Genaro Ruiz
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island, Rhode Island State Police, City of Providence, Town of Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GUY v. STATE OF RHODE ISLAND et al
as 1:2016cv00464
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM GUY
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island, Town of Bristol, Town of Barrington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McLaughlin v. Town of Tiverton Zoning Board of Review et al
as 1:2016cv00099
Plaintiff:
William McLaughlin
Defendant:
Town of Tiverton Zoning Board of Review , Tiverton Town Council and Matthew Wojcik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. CharterCARE Health Partners et al
as 1:2016cv00034
Defendant:
CharterCARE Health Partners, Roger Williams Medical Center, Steve Finegan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
