Cases 51 - 60 of 60
Montgomery v. Willis et al
as 2:2011cv00478
Plaintiff:
Terrell Rhodes Montgomery
Defendant:
Adam Mason Willis, Mount Pleasant Police Department, Donald Higgins Howe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padilla v. Adams
as 7:2011cv00008
Plaintiff:
Melvin Rodriguez Padilla
Defendant:
Marcia S Adams and South Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv03238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Odom v. McMaster et al
as 2:2010cv00873
Plaintiff:
Anthony C Odom
Defendant:
Henry D McMaster, David Pascoe, J Strom Thurmond, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
craigslist Inc v. McMaster et al
as 2:2009cv01308
Plaintiff:
craigslist Inc
Defendant:
Henry D McMaster, David Pascoe, Barbara R Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whitehead v. Newberry County et al
as 8:2008cv04074
Plaintiff:
Tommy C Whitehead and Tommy C Whitehead
Defendant:
Newberry County, Wayne Adams, John David Dawkins and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fulton v. Myrtle Beach Police Department et al
as 4:2008cv01064
Plaintiff:
Fannie Fulton
Defendant:
Myrtle Beach Police Department, The City of Myrtle Beach South Carolina, The City of Myrtle Beach South Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Adams v. Patel et al
as 3:2007cv01142
Plaintiff:
Jackson K Adams
Defendant:
Officer Patel, Officer Patel, Officer Morelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Odom v. Walmart et al
as 2:2007cv00247
Plaintiff:
Christopher Odom
Defendant:
Walmart, Walmart Insurance Policy Holder, Stephen Key and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
