Cases 51 - 60 of 282
Michel et al v. Carter et al
as 3:2020cv00245
Defendant:
James E. Carter, Brandon Shane Brown, Derek Marlow and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda Michel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ling v. Campbell County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2020cv00233
Defendant:
Dakota Williams, Sean Brown, Joshua Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Ling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blevins v. Scott County, Tennessee et al (TV2)
as 3:2020cv00224
Defendant:
Edward Capparelli, M.D., Scott County, Tennessee, Amy Nicely and others
Plaintiff:
Keesha Blevins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sisson v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2020cv02201
Defendant:
Detective Parks, T. Michael, City of Memphis and others
Plaintiff:
Orlando Sisson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hobson et al v. Esper
as 3:2020cv00076
Defendant:
Mark T. Esper
Plaintiff:
Gladys Blount, Desma Blount, Faye Rennell Hobson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Brown et al v. Shelby County Tenn. et al
as 2:2020cv02005
Defendant:
Nakia Kirkwood, Shelby County Tenn., Unknown Judicial Commissioner and others
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Brown and John Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pemberton v. Scott County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2020cv00002
Defendant:
Scott County, Tennessee, Brittney Brown, Brittany Massengale and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Allen Pemberton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02887
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Parsons v. Tester et al
as 2:2019cv00225
Defendant:
Evan Martin, Joshua Peters, Bradley Sexton and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Parsons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
as 2:2019cv02859
Plaintiff:
Madie Brown, Linda Jones, Devin Pigues and others
Defendant:
AT&T Corporation and AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
