Cases 51 - 60 of 81
ANDERSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv05614
Plaintiff:
KAREN ANDERSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , DEPARTMENT OF LICENSES & INSPECTIONS, FRAN BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CALDWELL et al v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv04644
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CALDWELL and MONIQUE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and WILLIAM BURNS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01877
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
FUNARO et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv01520
Plaintiff:
FRANK FUNARO
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN MASSI, WILLIAM LA TORRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MITCHELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2010cv07437
Plaintiff:
JACOB F. MITCHELL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , ISAM ELAYAN , SADIE CARNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv07279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. BEARD et al
as 2:2010cv05604
Plaintiff:
JOSH LEE ANDERSON
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, JOSEPH J. PIAZZA, DAVID A. VARANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VURIMINDI v. REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2010cv01891
Plaintiff:
VAMSIDHAR R VURIMINDI
Defendant:
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, OFFICE OF THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, DARRELL CLARKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BURNS v. DICHTER et al
as 2:2010cv00522
Plaintiff:
MELISSA M. BURNS
Defendant:
HARRIET DICHTER and RAYMOND S. HART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ELISRA, LLC v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv01583
Plaintiff:
ELISRA, LLC
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , MICHAEL NUTTER and FRANCES BURNS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
