Cases 51 - 60 of 156
Mark Hedges v. David S. Wesley et al
as 2:2015cv00713
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Alexander A. Bustamante, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Hedges
Harold Ernest Harvey II v. Edmund G Brown Jr
as 2:2014cv09289
Defendant:
Governor of CA Edmund G. Brown, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Harold Ernest Harvey II
Morales v. Brown et al
as 1:2014at00809
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Jeffrey A. Beard, Matthew L. Cate and others
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Ignatius Diamond v. United States et al
as 5:2014cv01922
Defendant:
Andre Birotte, Jr, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., California Department of Motor Vehicles and others
Plaintiff:
James Ignatius Diamond
Charles Ray Hunter v. Barack Obama et al
as 2:2014cv07202
Defendant:
ABC 7, Charlie Beck, John Boehner and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Hunter
Everson v. Sonoma County et al
as 3:2014cv03449
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Everson
Defendant:
City of Santa Rosa, County of Sonoma, Edmund G. Brown, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sassman v. Brown et al
as 2:2014cv01679
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr. and Jeffrey A. Beard
Plaintiff:
William A. Sassman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Nichols v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 14-55873
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES NICHOLS
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., in his official capacity as Governor of California and KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, Attorney General in her official capacity as Attorney General of California
Thymes v. People of the State of California et al
as 5:2014cv02377
Plaintiff:
John A. Thymes
Defendant:
People of the State of California, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Nelson v. City Of Oakland et al
as 3:2014cv02332
Plaintiff:
Jesse Nelson
Defendant:
City of Oakland, Oakland Animal Services Division and Edmund G. Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
